The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Waste not, want not: revisiting the analysis that called into question the practice of rarefaction
|
---|---|
Published in |
mSphere, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1128/msphere.00355-23 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patrick D. Schloss |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Czechia | 1 | 1% |
Thailand | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 77 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 67 | 67% |
Members of the public | 33 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#771,771
of 26,562,579 outputs
Outputs from mSphere
#78
of 2,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,202
of 385,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from mSphere
#1
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,562,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.