The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Type I methanotrophs dominated methane oxidation and assimilation in rice paddy fields by the consequence of niche differentiation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology and Fertility of Soils, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00374-023-01773-x |
| Authors |
Shengmeng Zheng, Shaohong Deng, Chong Ma, Yinhang Xia, Hang Qiao, Jun Zhao, Wei Gao, Qiang Tu, Youming Zhang, Yichao Rui, Jinshui Wu, Yirong Su, Xiangbi Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,149,468
of 25,231,854 outputs
Outputs from Biology and Fertility of Soils
#20
of 632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,171
of 332,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology and Fertility of Soils
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,231,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them