↓ Skip to main content

1940年代, 50年代の日本の微分幾何

Overview of attention for article published in SUGAKU, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 351)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
1940年代, 50年代の日本の微分幾何
Published in
SUGAKU, December 2008
DOI 10.11429/sugaku1947.49.225
Authors

小林 昭七

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,164,774
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from SUGAKU
#35
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,464
of 185,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SUGAKU
#13
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.