The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
International Pooled Analysis of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Premenopausal Breast Cancer in Women From 19 Cohorts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.23.01101 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iain R. Timmins, Michael E. Jones, Katie M. O'Brien, Hans-Olov Adami, Dagfinn Aune, Laura Baglietto, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Kristen D. Brantley, Yu Chen, Jessica Clague DeHart, Tess V. Clendenen, Laure Dossus, A. Heather Eliassen, Olivia Fletcher, Agnès Fournier, Niclas Håkansson, Susan E. Hankinson, Richard S. Houlston, Corinne E. Joshu, Victoria A. Kirsh, Cari M. Kitahara, Woon-Puay Koh, Martha S. Linet, Hannah Lui Park, Brigid M. Lynch, Anne M. May, Lene Mellemkjær, Roger L. Milne, Julie R. Palmer, Fulvio Ricceri, Thomas E. Rohan, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Maria-Jose Sánchez, Xiao-Ou Shu, Karl Smith-Byrne, Karen Steindorf, Malin Sund, Celine M. Vachon, Lars J. Vatten, Kala Visvanathan, Elisabete Weiderpass, Walter C. Willett, Alicja Wolk, Jian-Min Yuan, Wei Zheng, Hazel B. Nichols, Dale P. Sandler, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Minouk J. Schoemaker |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 64 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 10% |
| Scientists | 4 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1193. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#12,816
of 26,588,416 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#7
of 23,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272
of 395,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.