↓ Skip to main content

博物館と発掘現場で体感する日本一のモササウルス化石

Overview of attention for article published in Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 135)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
博物館と発掘現場で体感する日本一のモササウルス化石
Published in
Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), June 2021
DOI 10.15080/agcjchikyukagaku.75.2_147
Authors

小原 正顕

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,502,570
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku)
#3
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,962
of 456,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku)
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them