↓ Skip to main content

日常生活における麻痺手の使用頻度と上肢機能評価にミスマッチが生じた脳卒中亜急性期の一例

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Occupational Therapy Research, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日常生活における麻痺手の使用頻度と上肢機能評価にミスマッチが生じた脳卒中亜急性期の一例
Published in
Japanese Occupational Therapy Research, December 2023
DOI 10.32178/jotr.42.6_780
Authors

石根 幹久, 花田 恵介, 徳田 和宏, 竹林 崇, 藤田 敏晃

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,792,302
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Occupational Therapy Research
#54
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,667
of 378,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Occupational Therapy Research
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.