↓ Skip to main content

食用コオロギ摂取によりアレルギー症状を呈した幼児例

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 490)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
食用コオロギ摂取によりアレルギー症状を呈した幼児例
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, December 2023
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.72.1258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muneo Minoshima, Mai Tokunaga, Yumi Koike, Yasunori Ito

Abstract

In recent years, the consumption of edible insects has gained attention, and the potential allergic risks associated with their ingestion have been pointed out, though there are limited case reports. A 3-year-old boy exhibited an immediate allergic reaction, showing symptoms of sneezing, nasal discharge, coughing, and eyelid edema after ingesting two cricket crackers. He had previously consumed shrimp but had never eaten edible insects. Given his lack of a history of allergic diseases, the onset of this allergy was unexpected. Subsequent prick tests and oral food challenge tests confirmed that the Two-spotted cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus) was the allergen responsible for his symptoms. The IgE inhibition test indicated that the cricket significantly suppressed the specific IgE levels for moth, shrimp, and mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus). This incident marked the first time in the patient's life that he exhibited allergic symptoms, and it serves as a significant case highlighting the risks of allergies from edible insects. Known allergens in insects include tropomyosin and arginine kinase, which are common in arthropods, but there are reports of other allergens as well, suggesting potential sensitization from cross-reactions. As the consumption of insects becomes more widespread, the number of allergic cases may increase, and food labeling and preventive measures should be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,735,462
of 26,210,734 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#30
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,243
of 379,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,210,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them