↓ Skip to main content

A horizon scan of global biological conservation issues for 2024

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 3,287)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
49 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
170 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A horizon scan of global biological conservation issues for 2024
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, December 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2023.11.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

William J Sutherland, Craig Bennett, Peter N M Brotherton, Stuart H M Butchart, Holly M Butterworth, Stewart J Clarke, Nafeesa Esmail, Erica Fleishman, Kevin J Gaston, James E Herbert-Read, Alice C Hughes, Jennifer James, Hermanni Kaartokallio, Xavier Le Roux, Fiona A Lickorish, Sarah Newport, James E Palardy, James W Pearce-Higgins, Lloyd S Peck, Nathalie Pettorelli, Richard B Primack, Willow E Primack, Irene R Schloss, Mark D Spalding, Dirk Ten Brink, Eleanor Tew, Anastasiya Timoshyna, Nicolas Tubbs, James E M Watson, Jonathan Wentworth, Jeremy D Wilson, Ann Thornton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 170 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 137 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Unspecified 17 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Other 12 8%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 31%
Environmental Science 38 26%
Unspecified 17 12%
Engineering 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 502. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2024.
All research outputs
#55,136
of 26,556,730 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#15
of 3,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#941
of 389,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,730 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.