The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A radial‐flow device for the biopurification of a model VOC‐ and wood‐smoke‐ contaminated confined space
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/jctb.7533 |
Authors |
Jessica San Martin‐Davison, Felipe Scott, Christian Vergara‐Ojeda, Patricio Moreno‐Casas, Cecile Hort, Alberto Vergara‐Fernández |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 29% |
Researcher | 2 | 29% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 29% |
Engineering | 2 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,058,810
of 25,042,800 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
#7
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,540
of 271,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,042,800 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them