↓ Skip to main content

Roller-Crawler Type of Omni-Directional Mobile robot for Off-Road Running

Overview of attention for article published in TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series C, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Roller-Crawler Type of Omni-Directional Mobile robot for Off-Road Running
Published in
TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series C, January 1999
DOI 10.1299/kikaic.65.3282
Authors

Takashi ISODA, CHEN Peng, Shinichiro MITSUTAKE, Toshio TOYOTA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#17,042,920
of 25,046,311 outputs
Outputs from TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series C
#164
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,885
of 103,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series C
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.