The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A pragmatic approach for integrating molecular tools into biodiversity conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Science and Practice, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/csp2.13053 |
| Authors |
Laura D. Bertola, Anna Brüniche‐Olsen, Francine Kershaw, Isa‐Rita M. Russo, Anna J. MacDonald, Paul Sunnucks, Michael W. Bruford, Carlos Daniel Cadena, Kyle M. Ewart, Mark de Bruyn, Mark D. B. Eldridge, Richard Frankham, Juan M. Guayasamin, Catherine E. Grueber, Thierry B. Hoareau, Sean Hoban, Paul A. Hohenlohe, Margaret E. Hunter, Antoinette Kotze, Josiah Kuja, Robert C. Lacy, Linda Laikre, Nathan Lo, Mariah H. Meek, Joachim Mergeay, Cinnamon Mittan‐Moreau, Linda E. Neaves, David O'Brien, Joel W. Ochieng, Rob Ogden, Pablo Orozco‐terWengel, Mónica Páez‐Vacas, Jennifer Pierson, Katherine Ralls, Robyn E. Shaw, Etotépé A. Sogbohossou, Adam Stow, Tammy Steeves, Cristiano Vernesi, Mrinalini Watsa, Gernot Segelbacher |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Saint Barthélemy | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Isle of Man | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 64 | 53% |
| Scientists | 51 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#646,477
of 26,560,982 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#102
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,809
of 389,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.