↓ Skip to main content

Effective Teacher Professional Development: New Theory and a Meta-Analytic Test

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Educational Research, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
79 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective Teacher Professional Development: New Theory and a Meta-Analytic Test
Published in
Review of Educational Research, December 2023
DOI 10.3102/00346543231217480
Authors

Sam Sims, Harry Fletcher-Wood, Alison O’Mara-Eves, Sarah Cottingham, Claire Stansfield, Josh Goodrich, Jo Van Herwegen, Jake Anders

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Lecturer 7 6%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Master 7 6%
Unspecified 6 5%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 59 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 28 23%
Unspecified 6 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Mathematics 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 65 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#787,003
of 26,522,687 outputs
Outputs from Review of Educational Research
#106
of 834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,255
of 387,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Educational Research
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,522,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.