↓ Skip to main content

Use of the coextrusion technique for producing flame‐retardant and antistatic fibers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Polymer Science, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of the coextrusion technique for producing flame‐retardant and antistatic fibers
Published in
Journal of Applied Polymer Science, March 2003
DOI 10.1002/app.1976.070201025
Authors

Chang Dae Han, Young Woo Kim

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,386,799
of 25,059,640 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Polymer Science
#1,990
of 11,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,363
of 60,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Polymer Science
#448
of 2,005 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,059,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,383 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,005 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.