The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bacteriophage adsorption during transport through porous media: chemical perturbations and reversibility
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, May 2002
|
DOI | 10.1021/es00024a016 |
Authors |
Roger C. Bales, Stephen R. Hinkle, Thomas W. Kroeger, Kristen Stocking, Charles P. Gerba |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 89 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 33% |
Researcher | 15 | 16% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 23 | 25% |
Engineering | 22 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 12% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Chemical Engineering | 5 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#5,666,927
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#6,356
of 21,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,548
of 128,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#392
of 2,153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.