↓ Skip to main content

中央アジアの仏教寺院を復元する ― 石窟構造、美術、そして説一切有部の二分派 ―

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Abhidharma Studies, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
中央アジアの仏教寺院を復元する ― 石窟構造、美術、そして説一切有部の二分派 ―
Published in
Journal of Abhidharma Studies, December 2023
DOI 10.34501/abhidharmastudies.4.0_89
Authors

檜山 智美

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,071,390
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Abhidharma Studies
#2
of 7 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,097
of 359,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Abhidharma Studies
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them