↓ Skip to main content

薩摩半島から得られたミナミヒメハゼの記録,ヒメハゼ属の一種Favonigobius sp. sensu Matsui et al. (2014) の国内における分布状況,および両種の標徴に関する新知見

Overview of attention for article published in Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 107)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
薩摩半島から得られたミナミヒメハゼの記録,ヒメハゼ属の一種Favonigobius sp. sensu Matsui et al. (2014) の国内における分布状況,および両種の標徴に関する新知見
Published in
Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, January 2024
DOI 10.34583/ichthy.40.0_1
Authors

是枝 伶旺, 百瀬 樹, 本村 浩之

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,200,690
of 26,183,699 outputs
Outputs from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#19
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,504
of 373,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,183,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.