The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Do the physical activity questions in the Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria truly reflect a decline in physical activity?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geriatrics & Gerontology International, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1111/ggi.14804 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Koutatsu Nagai, Koki Akai, Itaru Tanaka, Haruhi Shimizu, Ryota Matsuzawa, Kayoko Tamaki, Hiroshi Kusunoki, Yosuke Wada, Shotaro Tsuji, Kana Hashimoto, Ken Shinmura |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,563,358
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Geriatrics & Gerontology International
#105
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,309
of 377,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geriatrics & Gerontology International
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.