↓ Skip to main content

心理的準備のない状況における一次救命処置の手技の質

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
心理的準備のない状況における一次救命処置の手技の質
Published in
Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, December 2023
DOI 10.11240/jsem.26.687
Authors

須田 果穂, 山勢 博彰, 井上 真美, 南原 桃子, 藤村 夏音

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,376,857
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#65
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,740
of 360,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.