The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exposure Rates from 238Pu Fueled Nuclear Battery for Cardiac Pacemaker
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radioisotopes, January 1981
|
| DOI | 10.3769/radioisotopes.30.11_638 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shinichiro KURIHARA, Tadashi SAITO, Takashi KIKEGAWA, Shinichi KANAYA, ARAI Hajime, Mamoru TAKEYAMA, Kazuko YAMAGUCHI, Katsuhiro KAWASHIMA, NODA Yutaka |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,045,990
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Radioisotopes
#154
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,371
of 29,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radioisotopes
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.