The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Best practice recommendations for medically assisted reproduction in patients with known cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Fertility, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/14647273.2023.2278295 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate English, Charlotte Frise, Johanna Trinder, Matthew Cauldwell, Maggie Simpson, Dawn Adamson, Chris Elton, Gwenda Burns, Meenakshi Choudhary, Mike Nathanson, Leema Robert, Jim Moore, Pat O’Brien, Jyotsna Pundir |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 20% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,987,382
of 26,383,299 outputs
Outputs from Human Fertility
#41
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,981
of 381,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Fertility
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.