You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Kinase inhibitor pulldown assay (KiP) for clinical proteomics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Proteomics, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12014-023-09448-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexander B. Saltzman, Doug W. Chan, Matthew V. Holt, Junkai Wang, Eric J. Jaehnig, Meenakshi Anurag, Purba Singh, Anna Malovannaya, Beom-Jun Kim, Matthew J. Ellis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
Researcher | 2 | 25% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 50% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#642,665
of 25,233,554 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#8
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,316
of 174,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,233,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them