The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 441 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Top-predator recovery abates geomorphic decline of a coastal ecosystem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-023-06959-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brent B. Hughes, Kathryn M. Beheshti, M. Tim Tinker, Christine Angelini, Charlie Endris, Lee Murai, Sean C. Anderson, Sarah Espinosa, Michelle Staedler, Joseph A. Tomoleoni, Madeline Sanchez, Brian R. Silliman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Italy | 6 | 1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 385 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 380 | 86% |
| Scientists | 50 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 12 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1846. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,719
of 26,540,415 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#591
of 100,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123
of 384,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#14
of 997 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,540,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 997 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.