The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Application of lidar to assess the habitat selection of an endangered small mammal in an estuarine wetland environment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology and Evolution, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/ece3.10894 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jason S. Hagani, John Y. Takekawa, Shannon M. Skalos, Michael L. Casazza, Melissa K. Riley, Sarah A. Estrella, Laureen M. Barthman‐Thompson, Katie R. Smith, Kevin J. Buffington, Karen M. Thorne |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 33 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 55% |
Scientists | 12 | 32% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 75% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 75% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,751,834
of 26,461,995 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Evolution
#909
of 8,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,728
of 382,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Evolution
#16
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,461,995 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.