The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rationing in an Era of Multiple Tight Constraints: Is Cost-Utility Analysis Still Fit for Purpose?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/s40258-023-00858-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Helen Dakin, Apostolos Tsiachristas |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
Colombia | 1 | 14% |
Australia | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 25% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 25% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 25% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 13% |
Engineering | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,249,491
of 26,588,548 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#125
of 860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,266
of 387,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,548 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.