↓ Skip to main content

Using resiliency, redundancy, and representation in a Bayesian belief network to assess imperilment of riverine fishes

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosphere, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using resiliency, redundancy, and representation in a Bayesian belief network to assess imperilment of riverine fishes
Published in
Ecosphere, January 2024
DOI 10.1002/ecs2.4738
Authors

Corey G. Dunn, David A. Schumann, Michael E. Colvin, Logan J. Sleezer, Matthew Wagner, D. Todd Jones‐Farrand, Erin Rivenbark, Sarah McRae, Kristine Evans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 10%
Psychology 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,969,406
of 26,175,267 outputs
Outputs from Ecosphere
#799
of 3,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,691
of 371,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosphere
#8
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,175,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.