The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Studies of angiospermous wood in Australian brown coal by nuclear magnetic resonance and analytical pyrolysis: new insights into the early coalification process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Coal Geology, July 1989
|
| DOI | 10.1016/0166-5162(89)90091-8 |
| Authors |
Patrick G. Hatcher, Michael A. Wilson, Anthony M. Vassallo, Harry E. Lerch |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 43% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 29% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 29% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,885,697
of 26,231,860 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Coal Geology
#130
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,213
of 13,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Coal Geology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,231,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them