You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electronic Structure Evolution with Composition Alteration of RhxCuy Alloy Nanoparticles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep41264 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalia Palina, Osami Sakata, L. S. R. Kumara, Chulho Song, Katsutoshi Sato, Katsutoshi Nagaoka, Tokutaro Komatsu, Hirokazu Kobayashi, Kohei Kusada, Hiroshi Kitagawa |
| Abstract |
The change in electronic structure of extremely small RhxCuy alloy nanoparticles (NPs) with composition variation was investigated by core-level (CL) and valence-band (VB) hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. A combination of CL and VB spectra analyses confirmed that intermetallic charge transfer occurs between Rh and Cu. This is an important compensation mechanism that helps to explain the relationship between the catalytic activity and composition of RhxCuy alloy NPs. For monometallic Rh and Rh-rich alloy (Rh0.77Cu0.23) NPs, the formation of Rh surface oxide with a non-integer oxidation state (Rh((3-δ)+)) resulted in high catalytic activity. Conversely, for alloy NPs with comparable Rh:Cu ratio (Rh0.53Cu0.47 and Rh0.50Cu0.50), the decreased fraction of catalytically active Rh((3-δ)+) oxide is compensated by charge transfer from Cu to Rh. As a result, ensuring negligible change in the catalytic activities of the NPs with comparable Rh:Cu ratio to those of Rh-rich and monometallic Rh NPs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 17% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 17% |
| Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2017.
All research outputs
#14,928,809
of 25,397,764 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#67,808
of 140,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,790
of 422,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,973
of 3,887 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,397,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,887 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.