The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EACTS/STS Guidelines for Diagnosing and Treating Acute and Chronic Syndromes of the Aortic Organ
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.01.021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Authors/Task Force Members, Martin Czerny, Martin Grabenwöger, Tim Berger, Victor Aboyans, Alessandro Della Corte, Edward P. Chen, Nimesh D. Desai, Julia Dumfarth, John A. Elefteriades, Christian D. Etz, Karen M. Kim, Maximilian Kreibich, Mario Lescan, Luca Di Marco, Andreas Martens, Carlos A. Mestres, Milan Milojevic, Christoph A. Nienaber, Gabriele Piffaretti, Ourania Preventza, Eduard Quintana, Bartosz Rylski, Christopher L. Schlett, Florian Schoenhoff, Santi Trimarchi, Konstantinos Tsagakis, EACTS/STS Scientific Document Group, Matthias Siepe, Anthony L. Estrera, Joseph E. Bavaria, Davide Pacini, Yutaka Okita, Arturo Evangelista, Katherine B. Harrington, Puja Kachroo, G. Chad Hughes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 7% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 24% |
| Scientists | 13 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 42% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 18% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2024.
All research outputs
#248,221
of 26,449,643 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#29
of 8,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,919
of 355,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,449,643 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.