↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale benchmark yields no evidence that language model surprisal explains syntactic disambiguation difficulty

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Memory & Language, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 942)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
70 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-scale benchmark yields no evidence that language model surprisal explains syntactic disambiguation difficulty
Published in
Journal of Memory & Language, August 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104510
Authors

Kuan-Jung Huang, Suhas Arehalli, Mari Kugemoto, Christian Muxica, Grusha Prasad, Brian Dillon, Tal Linzen

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2024.
All research outputs
#979,587
of 26,780,841 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Memory & Language
#35
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,833
of 295,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Memory & Language
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,780,841 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them