↓ Skip to main content

遠心処理後に測定するHbA1c測定法での採血管の取扱い(EDTA入り採血管の推奨)について

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 173)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
遠心処理後に測定するHbA1c測定法での採血管の取扱い(EDTA入り採血管の推奨)について
Published in
Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, May 2021
DOI 10.11213/tonyobyo.64.336
Authors

日本糖尿病学会糖尿病関連検査の標準化に関する委員会, 桑 克彦, 岡橋 美貴子, 佐藤 麻子, 難波 光義, 前田 士郎, 村上 正巳, 目黒 周, 西尾 善彦

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,622,529
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society
#23
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,975
of 463,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them