↓ Skip to main content

Letter to the editor: Comments on the paper “derivation of lump solutions to a variety of Boussinesq equations with distinct dimensions”

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Letter to the editor: Comments on the paper “derivation of lump solutions to a variety of Boussinesq equations with distinct dimensions”
Published in
International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, February 2024
DOI 10.1108/hff-03-2024-941
Authors

Roman Cherniha

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#23,229,566
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow
#40
of 62 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,718
of 337,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them