The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Neural waves and computation in a neural net model I: Convolutional hierarchies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10827-024-00866-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephen Selesnick |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 16% |
Japan | 2 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
Scientists | 5 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,708,565
of 26,083,840 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#21
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,667
of 349,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,083,840 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them