Title |
Circumpolar analysis of the Adélie Penguin reveals the importance of environmental variability in phenological mismatch
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1002/ecy.1749 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Casey Youngflesh, Stephanie Jenouvrier, Yun Li, Rubao Ji, David G. Ainley, Grant Ballard, Christophe Barbraud, Karine Delord, Katie M. Dugger, Louise M. Emmerson, William R. Fraser, Jefferson T. Hinke, Phil O’B. Lyver, Silvia Olmastroni, Colin J. Southwell, Susan G. Trivelpiece, Wayne Z. Trivelpiece, Heather J. Lynch |
Abstract |
Evidence of climate change-driven shifts in plant and animal phenology have raised concerns that certain trophic interactions may be increasingly mismatched in time, resulting in declines in reproductive success. Given the constraints imposed by extreme seasonality at high latitudes and the rapid shifts in phenology seen in the Arctic, we would also expect Antarctic species to be highly vulnerable to climate change-driven phenological mismatches with their environment. However, few studies have assessed the impacts of phenological change in Antarctica. Using the largest database of phytoplankton phenology, sea-ice phenology, and Adélie penguin breeding phenology and breeding success assembled to date, we find that while a temporal match between penguin breeding phenology and optimal environmental conditions sets an upper limit on breeding success, only a weak relationship to the mean exists. Despite previous work suggesting that divergent trends in Adélie penguin breeding phenology are apparent across the Antarctic continent, we find no such trends. Furthermore, we find no trend in the magnitude of phenological mismatch, suggesting that mismatch is driven by interannual variability in environmental conditions rather than climate change-driven trends, as observed in other systems. We propose several criteria necessary for a species to experience a strong climate change-driven phenological mismatch, of which several may be violated by this system. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 22% |
Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 33% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
Researcher | 17 | 19% |
Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 15% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 46% |
Environmental Science | 21 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 20 | 22% |