↓ Skip to main content

An improved method for the determination of phytoplankton chlorophyll using N, N-dimethylformamide

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Oceanography, August 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
674 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An improved method for the determination of phytoplankton chlorophyll using N, N-dimethylformamide
Published in
Journal of Oceanography, August 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf02125580
Authors

Reiko Suzuki, Takashi Ishimaru

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 10%
Engineering 10 7%
Chemistry 6 4%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1996.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oceanography
#99
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,315
of 14,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oceanography
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them