↓ Skip to main content

カンディンスキー作《いくつかの円》(一九二六年) : 抽象絵画における空間表現の問題

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 194)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
カンディンスキー作《いくつかの円》(一九二六年) : 抽象絵画における空間表現の問題
Published in
Aesthetics, May 2017
DOI 10.20631/bigaku.46.2_33
Authors

真野 宏子

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,891,409
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetics
#17
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,418
of 332,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetics
#9
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.