↓ Skip to main content

Accessible birding in the United States: constraints to and facilitators of birding with disabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 369)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accessible birding in the United States: constraints to and facilitators of birding with disabilities
Published in
Human Dimensions of Wildlife, March 2024
DOI 10.1080/10871209.2024.2325157
Authors

Emily N. Sinkular, A. A. Dayer, F. A. McGregor, M. J. Karns

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#843,022
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Human Dimensions of Wildlife
#18
of 369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,727
of 164,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Dimensions of Wildlife
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them