↓ Skip to main content

梅津順一・小野塚知二 編著 『大塚久雄から資本主義と共同体を考える―コモンウィール・結社・ネーション』日本経済評論社,2018 年,viii+319 頁

Overview of attention for article published in The History of Economic Thought, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
梅津順一・小野塚知二 編著 『大塚久雄から資本主義と共同体を考える―コモンウィール・結社・ネーション』日本経済評論社,2018 年,viii+319 頁
Published in
The History of Economic Thought, October 2019
DOI 10.5362/jshet.60.2_119
Authors

伊藤 誠一郎

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The History of Economic Thought
#5
of 56 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,597
of 370,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The History of Economic Thought
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them