The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Geotechnical Investigation of Exposed Intertidal Flats at the Great Bay Estuary Using Sediment Sampling and Satellite-Based Synthetic Aperture Radar
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal & Ocean Engineering, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1061/jwped5.wweng-2051 |
| Authors |
Julie Paprocki, Nina Stark, Thomas Lippman, Hans C. Graber |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,731,443
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal & Ocean Engineering
#29
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,181
of 352,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal & Ocean Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them