The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Five good reasons not to dismiss scientific binomial nomenclature in conservation, environmental education and citizen science: A case study with bees
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Entomology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1111/syen.12636 |
Authors |
Nicolas J. Vereecken, Kit S. Prendergast, Silas Bossert, Keng‐Lou James Hung, Stuart P. M. Roberts, Cristian Villagra, Natapot Warrit, Joseph S. Wilson, Thomas J. Wood, Michael C. Orr |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 15% |
Canada | 3 | 5% |
United States | 3 | 5% |
Germany | 3 | 5% |
India | 2 | 3% |
Sweden | 2 | 3% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 29 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 36 | 55% |
Scientists | 22 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 50% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 67% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,032,335
of 26,740,027 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Entomology
#28
of 1,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,326
of 355,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Entomology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,740,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.