↓ Skip to main content

Which Portion of Physiotherapy Treatments' Effect Is Not Attributable to the Specific Effects in People With Musculoskeletal Pain? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
289 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which Portion of Physiotherapy Treatments' Effect Is Not Attributable to the Specific Effects in People With Musculoskeletal Pain? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, June 2024
DOI 10.2519/jospt.2024.12126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasmin Ezzatvar, Lirios Dueñas, Mercè Balasch-Bernat, Enrique Lluch-Girbés, Giacomo Rossettini

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 289 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 14 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Unspecified 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 14 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2024.
All research outputs
#215,018
of 26,799,422 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#57
of 2,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,024
of 330,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,799,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.