↓ Skip to main content

The Background of Beate Shirota's Draft and Constitutional Research Group

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Home Economics of Japan, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Background of Beate Shirota's Draft and Constitutional Research Group
Published in
Journal of Home Economics of Japan, March 2010
DOI 10.11428/jhej1987.51.5
Authors

Atsuko KUSANO, Haruka NAKANISHI, Hiroko ONOSE

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#15,473,420
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Home Economics of Japan
#99
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,827
of 106,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Home Economics of Japan
#52
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.