The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brecciation at the grain scale within the lithologies of the Winchcombe Mighei‐like carbonaceous chondrite
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Meteoritics & Planetary Science, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/maps.14164 |
| Authors |
Luke Daly, Martin D. Suttle, Martin R. Lee, John Bridges, Leon Hicks, Pierre‐Etienne M. C. Martin, Cameron J. Floyd, Laura E. Jenkins, Tobias Salge, Ashley J. King, Natasha V. Almeida, Diane Johnson, Patrick W. Trimby, Haithem Mansour, Fabian B. Wadsworth, Gavyn Rollinson, Matthew J. Genge, James Darling, Paul A. J. Bagot, Lee F. White, Natasha R. Stephen, Jennifer T. Mitchell, Sammy Griffin, Francesca M. Willcocks, Rhian Jones, Sandra Piazolo, Joshua F. Einsle, Alice Macente, Lydia J. Hallis, Aine O'Brien, Paul F. Schofield, Sara S. Russell, Helena Bates, Caroline Smith, Ian Franchi, Lucy V. Forman, Phil A. Bland, David Westmoreland, Iain Anderson, Richard Taylor, Mark Montgomery, Mark Parsons, Jérémie Vasseur, Matthias van Ginneken, Penelope J. Wozniakiewicz, Mark J. Burchell, Daniel Hallatt, Luke S. Alesbrook, Vassilia Spathis, Richard Worden, Julie Behnsen, Kate Black, Fireball Alliance |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2024.
All research outputs
#11,650
of 26,303,092 outputs
Outputs from Meteoritics & Planetary Science
#2
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219
of 340,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Meteoritics & Planetary Science
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,303,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.