The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structurally Selective Ozonolysis of p-Phenylenediamines and Toxicity in Coho Salmon and Rainbow Trout
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ChemRxiv, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-jmptn |
| Authors |
Linna Xie, Jie Yu, Pranav Nair, Jianxian Sun, Holly Barrett, Oliver Meek, Xing Qian, Diwen Yang, Lisa Kennedy, Derek Kozakiewicz, Chunyan Hao, John D. Hansen, Justin B. Greer, Jonathan P.D. Abbatt, Hui Peng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#20,535,317
of 26,106,015 outputs
Outputs from ChemRxiv
#14,339
of 18,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,758
of 324,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemRxiv
#757
of 1,023 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,716 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,023 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.