The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chemical looping-based catalytic CH4 decomposition and successive coke gasification with CO2 on ordered mesoporous NiMCeOx (M = Co, Zr, La)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chemical Engineering Journal, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cej.2024.151034 |
Authors |
Sang Beom Han, Min Sung Kim, Yuchen Deng, Kyun Yeon Kang, Jae-Soon Choi, Eunjoo Jang, Jong Wook Bae |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#262,316
of 25,830,657 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Engineering Journal
#9
of 6,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#389
of 45,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Engineering Journal
#1
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,654 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.