You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Homologous recombination contributes to the repair of acetaldehyde-induced DNA damage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Cycle, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/15384101.2024.2335028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kosuke Yamazaki, Tomohiro Iguchi, Yutaka Kanoh, Kazuto Takayasu, Trinh Thi To Ngo, Ayaka Onuki, Hideya Kawaji, Shunji Oshima, Tomomasa Kanda, Hisao Masai, Hiroyuki Sasanuma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,489,937
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Cell Cycle
#196
of 3,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,428
of 232,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Cycle
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,668 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them