The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Leveraging natural capital accounting to support businesses with nature-related risk assessments and disclosures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2022.0328 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jane Carter Ingram, Emily J. McKenzie, Kenneth J. Bagstad, John Finisdore, Rayne van den Berg, Eli Fenichel, Michael Vardon, Stephen Posner, Marta Santamaria, Lisa Mandle, Richard Barker, James Spurgeon |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#21,517,382
of 26,409,992 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#6,728
of 7,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,083
of 341,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#60
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,409,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.