The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of the Cutting Size and Morphological Factors of Pruned Branches on Improving the Productivity of Rooted Cuttings in Pinus thunbergii Hedges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japanese Forest Society, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.4005/jjfs.91.335 |
| Authors |
Koji Matsunaga, Mineko Ohira, Noritsugu Kuramoto |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,719,234
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Forest Society
#30
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,575
of 185,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Forest Society
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them