The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A prospective health economic evaluation to determine the productivity loss due to premature mortality from oral cancer in India
|
---|---|
Published in |
Head & Neck, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/hed.27776 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Arjun Singh, Richard Sullivan, Manasi Bavaskar, Rathan Shetty, Poonam Joshi, Sudhir Nair, Sudeep Gupta, Pankaj Chaturvedi, Rajendra Badwe |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,143,890
of 25,861,751 outputs
Outputs from Head & Neck
#79
of 4,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,611
of 230,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Neck
#1
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,861,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.