The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quantum Machine Learning for Credit Scoring
|
---|---|
Published in |
Mathematics, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.3390/math12091391 |
Authors |
Nikolaos Schetakis, Davit Aghamalyan, Michael Boguslavsky, Agnieszka Rees, Marc Rakotomalala, Paul Robert Griffin |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 27% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,507,523
of 25,877,363 outputs
Outputs from Mathematics
#66
of 3,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,581
of 176,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematics
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,877,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,528 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.