↓ Skip to main content

新規疾患

Overview of attention for article published in [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
新規疾患
Published in
[Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology, October 2016
DOI 10.11406/rinketsu.57.2029
Pubmed ID
Authors

正木 康史, 川端 浩, 高井 和江, 塚本 憲史, 藤本 信乃, 石垣 靖人, 黒瀬 望, 小島 勝, 中村 栄男, 木下 朝博, 青木 定夫, TAFRO症候群研究班

Abstract

TAFRO syndrome is a systemic inflammatory disorder manifesting as thrombocytopenia; anasarca including pleural effusion and ascites; fever; renal insufficiency; and organomegaly including hepatosplenomegaly and lymphadenopathy. Its onset may be acute or sub-acute, but its etiology remains unknown. Although several clinical and pathological characteristics of TAFRO syndrome resemble those of Castleman's disease, other specific features can differentiate between the two. Some patients have been successfully treated with glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants including cyclosporin A, tocilizumab and rituximab, whereas others are refractory to treatment, eventually succumbing to the disease. Early and reliable diagnoses and early treatments with appropriate agents are essential to enhancing patient survival. The 2015 updated diagnostic criteria, disease severity classification and treatment strategy for TAFRO syndrome, as formulated by Japanese research teams, are presented herein. Furthermore, clinicopathological data on 28 patients with this condition and similar symptoms (e.g., MCD with serositis and thrombocytopenia) were analyzed retrospectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Other 2 25%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2017.
All research outputs
#21,305,573
of 26,161,782 outputs
Outputs from [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology
#346
of 730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,683
of 323,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,161,782 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 730 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them